Papers with human evaluators
QUDeval: The Evaluation of Questions Under Discussion Discourse Parsing (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics poorly approximate parser quality, says a new study . questions under discussion is a linguistic framework that views discourse as asking questions and answering them . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for automatic evaluation of QUD parsing . they use a dataset of fine-grained evaluation of 2,190 QUD questions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows that satisfying constraints of QUD is still challenging for modern LLMs. |
Judge the Judges: A Large-Scale Evaluation Study of Neural Language Models for Online Review Generation (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for natural language generation are inadequate . distinguishing machine-generated text is challenging even for human evaluators . |
| Approach: | They compare human-based evaluators with automated evaluation procedures . they find human evaluers do not correlate well with discriminative evalators . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation methods are compared with a dozen state-of-the-art generators for online product reviews. |